Posts filed under ‘Time’

Ethiopia: The story of Birtukan Mideksa, an Ethiopian prisoner of conscience

 

By Zainab Salbi,  The Huffington Post

the story of Birtukan Mideksa, an Ethiopian prisoner of conscience

Today I would like to tell you the story of Birtukan Mideksa, an Ethiopian prisoner of conscience who is facing life imprisonment for speaking out against an oppressive government. Birtukan is an opposition leader of the Unity for Democracy and Justice (formerly Coalition for Unity and Democracy) party and is advocating for democracy and rule of law in Ethiopia. After years of civil unrest and war with Eritrea, Ethiopia is still struggling to overcome oppression and establish political freedom. The parliamentary elections in 2005 spurred violent protests, which led to the arbitrary arrest and detainment of hundreds of opposition leaders, journalists, human rights advocates and civilians. Birtukan was one of those arrested in 2005, and she received a life imprisonment sentence. Then, in 2007, Birtukan received a pardon and was released from prison, only to be put back into prison once more in 2008 for discussing the details of her prior arrest. Her original sentence of life imprisonment has since been reinstated.

Much of Birtukan’s time in prison has been spent in solitary confinement. The only people allowed to visit Birtukan are her mother and her four-year-old daughter. Before her arrest, Birtukan was the main provider for her family, who is now suffering not only emotionally but also financially from Birtukan’s imprisonment. She is not allowed to meet with any legal representation and the government refuses to listen to her needs. There are even reports that she is being denied medical treatment, despite numerous requests for a physician. The Red Cross and other humanitarian officials are being denied access to the prison, and the exact treatment of Birtukan is unknown.

Ethiopia: The story of Birtukan Mideksa, an Ethiopian prisoner of conscience 

When addressing the U.S. Congress in 2007, Birtukan stated that “only through dialogue and negotiation will stability and peace be guaranteed” in Ethiopia. In the context of the rampant human rights violations and other oppressive government actions, advocates for peace and freedom are desperately needed in Ethiopia. And yet, women like Birtukan are still being denied the opportunity to negotiate this peace.

Birtukan’s story represents the struggle women across the world are facing to have a political voice and to stand up for human rights. Take Jameela, a Palestinian woman from Gaza, who was imprisoned in Israel for 2 years when she was 18 years old for smuggling letters for the PLO. She was tortured. She was hanged from her hands for long periods, put in solitary confinement for about 6 months, and had drops of water dripping on her forehead for hours at a time. When she was finally released from prison, her entire community wanted to abandon her because they assumed she had been sexually abused in prison and thus had her honor taken away. Only her father and her future husband stood by her side. She is now living in a half-destroyed one-room house with her entire family. 

Or take Mona, a young activist from Iraq, who was continually raped by a captain during the war so that he would not kill her brothers. This captain started a habit of visiting her daily at her family home. There, he would take her to a bedroom in her house, close the door behind him (her brothers, mother and sisters are still in the living room), and rape her. He would then leave her home. “Day after day, week after week, month after month he did that and not once did my brothers or mother said anything. As a matter of fact, when I would refuse to go with him, they would scold me and urge me to go to him so he wouldn’t get upset. In the beginning, this whole ordeal was to save my brothers from prison.” Mona is now activist dedicated to rescuing prostituted girls and women who, no different from her, ended up in a path not because of their desires but because they were saving loved ones as she saved her brothers. 

According to the UN, 90% of modern war casualties are civilians, 75% of which are women and children. That reality only addresses the death tolls created by war. Statistics have yet to capture the price women pay for wars often just for living in it and trying to survive it. On top of political and military pressure, women are often faced with another layer of community and traditional demands. Then there are the women, like Birtukan, Jameela and Mona, who are trying to take a stand against these wars and who end up facing extreme oppression and human rights violations imposed by governments and military groups. 

The bravery of these women despite all odds is inspirational. Women everywhere are paying a personal price for their political reality. It is these women, and the millions of women survivors of conflict who are striving every day to carry on in the midst of astronomical challenges, who are pushing us forward in the global women’s movement. It is these women who are standing up for peace and equality, finding their voices and speaking truth in the face of oppression and fear. These women deserve to have their voices heard.

//

June 3, 2010 at 1:23 AM Leave a comment

A country of grey and gold

 

An election in Ethiopia promises little change

From The Economist online

THERE are two colours I associate with Ethiopia. Grey for the dust, the bare hills, stony soil and donkeys. Grey for the Soviet-era buildings in the towns and the fumes of ancient Lada cars. Then there is gold, in the fields at harvest time, in the sunshine at that lung-busting altitude, and the heavy jewellery worn by women. Gold especially for the churches, the icons, the luminous curls in the crosses and staves, and in the golden plumage of archangels who many Ethiopians believe overlook the inner workings of their lives.

Religion is central to life in Ethiopia, as it is in the rest of Africa. But it is of a very different type. Neighbouring Kenya became Christian just over a century ago. Its Christianity still has a stripped-down missionary flavour. The Amhara and Tigray regions of Ethiopia, by contrast, were Christian long before St Augustine of Canterbury landed in England. The Band Aid anthem to raise money for Ethiopian famine victims in 1984 was in some ways ill-judged: of course they knew it was Christmastime.

Yet Ethiopia is also a country of revolutionary zeal. It is ruled by an inner circle of former Marxist guerrillas who are not evidently religious. That sets up a tension in the country. After this week’s election victory by the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF), I ask Ethiopians what they would like to ask their long-serving prime minister, Meles Zenawi. Most often they say they would like to quiz him about God. “I want to know if he is a believer,” says my driver in Addis Ababa. Teddy—his name changed to protect his identity—is critical of the government. They have done many good things. But they like to control us.” Even in heavy traffic Teddy takes his hands off the steering wheel and crosses himself when passing one of the many churches. He gently recounts his own story of last week’s elections. The organisers of the taxi fleet he drives for are card-carrying members of the EPRDF. “We are not talking about many people. Maybe 20 out of a couple of hundred cabs. But they decide on a lot of things, including the renewal of licences. They told the rest of us we had to attend government rallies in a procession during the election campaign. Most of us refused. After the election they will come for us.” What will he do then? Teddy shrugs. He is close to retirement, but has two small children. “A man cannot live on his knees.”

The fear among Ethiopians like Teddy is similar to that of citizens in the Soviet bloc in the 1970s. Those who prove themselves to the party will be awarded promotions and sinecures, however modest. Those who refuse to join in risk losing the privileges they have. And for the few who openly challenge the way in which the EPRDF muddles its own interest with the national interest there is the prospect of censorship, harassment and prison.

Ethiopia is an authoritarian state, not a totalitarian one. The choice is difficult, but it remains a choice. The situation is in some ways harder than in the Soviet Union though. There is no barbed wire holding the Ethiopians in, rather an overwhelming indifference in the rest of the world. Nor is there much of an alternative to the EPRDF. Whatever criticism is made of Mr Zenawi, he is more cogent and measured than the opposition. Its heroes include Birtukan Mideksa, a single mother who is serving a life sentence in solitary confinement for standing up to the government. But her heroics are undercut by the failure of the opposition to unite around a sensible manifesto for the future of Ethiopia.

Over the next five years critics of the EPRDF can expect to be further marginalised. Western donors are largely happy with this state of affairs. They hope for something like an African version of Yugoslavia under Tito. Stability is indeed a precious prize, if your goal is to eradicate extreme poverty. The danger though is that progress at the bottom will mean suffocation of a an independent-minded middle class. Lackeys seldom make the creative leaps a country like Ethiopia needs as its population swells to perhaps as much 30m in the coming decades (up from 40m in the days of Band Aid). At present a tenth of the country would perish without foreign food aid. The EPRDF is unwilling to give up control of farmland, telecoms, and the internet. Ethiopia’s banks, stocks, and insurance markets are far behind other big African countries. None of that bodes well. Ethiopians have historically always attacked the centre from the periphery. If the country cannot run ahead of its poverty, the risk of a Yugoslav-style denouement grows. Religion plays into the fatalism. Many Ethiopians believe that the opposition is incidental. Only God can change their government.

June 3, 2010 at 1:14 AM Leave a comment

Donor Darling: What Ethiopian poll can teach Africa

 

By Will Ross BBC News

 Supporters of Meles Zenawi carry placards criticising rights groups in Addis Ababa on 25 May 25 2010 as they celebrate his poll victory

 Ruling party supporters have been angered by foreign criticism of the polls

What do a sports car and the Ethiopian opposition have in common? They both have two seats.

This joke is doing the rounds in Ethiopia after an almost embarrassing landslide victory for the governing EPRDF party and its allies left the opposition with just a lonely brace of seats in the 547 member parliament.

There is no word for “landslide” in the local Amharic language, but they need one now.

The European Union said the polls were marked by restrictions on political freedom and the unfair use of state resources, and there is international concern over increasing repression in Ethiopia.

Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi

The United States has every right to use its tax payers’ money as it sees fit

Meles Zenawi Ethiopian prime minister

But Prime Minister Meles Zenawi will not be losing any sleep.

A thorough trouncing is much better for the nerves than a nail-biter and it is unlikely that Ethiopia’s relationship with donor countries will change significantly even if a few fingers are briefly wagged.

The money will keep flowing.

“The United States has every right to use its tax payers’ money as it sees fit,” Mr Meles told reporters after his victory.

“If they feel that the outcome of the elections are such that they cannot continue our partnership, that’s fine.

“We shall be very grateful for the assistance they have given us so far and move on. Clearly we are not a protectorate,” he concluded.

Such comments are easier for Mr Meles to make now that he has a new friend in China – it will not utter a squeak over the elections.

Islamist buffer

China is helping with many infrastructure projects in Ethiopia – including an offer of a $500m (£344m) loan from the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China for the construction of the controversial Gibe Three hydroelectric dam.

Ethiopia receives aid worth around $2bn a year, mostly from the US and the UK.

The feeling amongst many donor countries is that the country desperately needs help in fighting poverty, and the money is being spent relatively wisely by Mr Meles’s government.

They see real progress: For example, a recent report by American researchers pointed to success in reducing child mortality.

A Chinese worker in Addis Ababa, January 2010
China is behind many infrastructure projects in Ethiopia

The report said that in 1990, 202 Ethiopian children per 1,000 died before the age of five. In 2010, the rate had halved to 101 deaths per 1,000.

Of course, Ethiopia still has a long way to go in comparison to somewhere like Singapore, where there are just two deaths per 1,000 children under the age of five.

Ethiopia is also a donor darling because it is seen as an invaluable buffer against the growing Islamic extremism in Somalia.

When it comes to America’s foreign policy, any concerns over shrinking democratic space or eye brow leaping election results are totally trumped by any help in “the war on terror”.

Mr Meles could be receiving a few phone calls from other African leaders searching for election tips.

The Ethiopian capital is famous for staging the hugely popular 10km race, the Great Addis Run, but now all talk is of ‘the Great Addis Turn Around’

Paul Kagame of Rwanda may not need the advice but his neighbour in Uganda, Yoweri Museveni, could do with a few hints on how to change the face of politics in the capital, Kampala, ahead of 2011 elections.

The Ethiopian capital is famous for staging the hugely popular 10km race, the Great Addis Run, but now all talk is of “the Great Addis Turn Around”.

Greatest enemies

In 2005, the opposition won all 23 parliamentary seats in Addis. In 2010 it kept just one. How?

The efficient well-oiled governing party machinery was a key factor – I lost count as to how many people told me that “the EPRDF only woke up in 2005″.

It was helped by the fact that the opposition was divided and fairly disorganised.

But many Ethiopia watchers suggest you have to look at what happened to the opposition over five years to get the whole picture.

If you try sending an e-mail from Ethiopia to the Committee to Protect Journalists, it miraculously bounces back

Almost 200 opposition supporters were shot dead when they demonstrated against what they saw as election theft in 2005; thousands were arrested, including opposition leaders who were sent to jail for close to years.

Birtukan Mideksa remains behind bars after being accused of breaking the terms of her pardon.

Press freedom has also been under attack. Journalists have fled the country since 2005 and if you try sending an e-mail from Ethiopia to the Committee to Protect Journalists, it miraculously bounces back.

Filming on the streets of Addis Ababa, it was hard to find people prepared to say on camera that they supported the opposition – many suggested that would be asking for trouble.

A car driving past a building site in Addis Ababa in 2007

 Addis Ababa has undergone great change in the last five years

The governing party dismisses all these allegations but analysts point out that the Ethiopian government is only willing to allow a certain degree of democracy and that will always be the root of friction with the donors – China excluded.

US-based Human Rights Watch said the government pressured, intimidated and threatened Ethiopian voters and said the most salient feature of the election was the months of repression preceding it.

One publication recently suggested that the Ethiopian government’s greatest enemies were Eritrea and the weather. Human Rights Watch could also be added to the list.

Map

It clearly angered the government as it shone a light on allegations of repression that no election observer team would be able to find – partly because they were not allowed in the country early enough.

But the African leaders hoping for tips from Mr Meles should also realise that hard work is also useful ahead of an election – it wins votes.

The scale of the housing estates being built on the edge of Addis Ababa is nothing short of staggering.

Time will tell how good the quality of the construction is, but there are also impressive eight-lane roads leading to these suburbs.

The development is by no means restricted to the capital: access to healthcare has improved in the rural areas and in Lalibela, 700km (about 435 miles) away from Addis Ababa, new classrooms are springing up and roads built.

Kenyans, Ugandans and others may be freer than Ethiopians but their list of “What my government has achieved” would be miserably short in comparison.

June 1, 2010 at 8:21 PM Leave a comment

Ethiopia’s Embarrassing Elections

By ABEBE GELLAW

Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi, one of America’s key allies in Africa, is gloating over his “landslide victory” in the country’s national elections earlier this month. The ruling party has claimed to have swept all but two of the 546 declared seats, which is more than enough to make the parliament a complete rubber stamp for Mr. Zenawi.

On Tuesday, a few hours before international observers released their preliminary report on the credibility of the polls, Mr. Zenawi gathered tens of thousands of his supporters for a victory rally at Meskel Square in Addis Ababa, and called on the opposition and the international community to fully accept the supposed verdict of the people of Ethiopia.

The rally was also well-choreographed to condemn “foreign elements,” especially Human Rights Watch, which had already dismissed the elections as fraudulent. “Behind an orderly façade, the government pressured, intimidated and threatened Ethiopian voters,” said Rona Peligal, Human Rights Watch’s acting Africa director. “Whatever the results, the most salient feature of this election was the months of repression preceding it.”

Despite growing international uproar, Mr. Zenawi had a different take on the outcome of the “historic” elections. “As the whole world knows,” he said, “the fourth national elections have taken place in a peaceful, democratic and credible manner. These elections have been conducted successfully according to plan,” he declared.

His own hype notwithstanding, Mr. Zenawi has never managed to convince independent observers that elections have been free and fair since he came to power in 1991 after waging a bloody, 17-year-long guerrilla war to oust his predecessor dictator, Mengistu Haile Mariam.

It was no surprise that the European Union and U.S. came out quickly, albeit quietly, to contradict Mr. Zenawi’s self-congratulatory victory speech. While both noted that the elections were largely peaceful and free of violence, they added they were marred by a narrowing political space and did not meet “international standards.” This is diplomatic understatement at its most impressive.

If even a modicum of “democratic legitimacy” can be had by stage-managing national elections every five years, then Mr. Zenawi and his brutal iron fist will undoubtedly rule Ethiopia for many more years to come. After all, Ethiopian’s multi-party system has been carefully crafted to allow ethnically fractured and impotent opposition parties to confront the ruling party’s juggernaut, while guarding the incumbent’s security, logistic, financial, political and organizational advantage. In Ethiopia under Meles, as in the Mengistu era, the state and the ruling party are one and the same.

These fourth national elections were not any different from the previous three. As usual, the result was a foregone conclusion well before the game kicked off. The ruling party, the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front, is a coalition of ethnic parties created by Mr. Zenawi’s minority Tigray people’s Liberation Front in 1989. The ruling umbrella group has managed to spread its tentacles across the country within the last two decades, and boasts a membership of well over five million—one in six of the 29 million people reported to have cast their votes. Every ruling party member was ordered to bring at least five other voters to the polls.

The only time the ruling party was on the verge of losing power was during the third national elections. In 2005, the atmosphere was freer and opposition parties were allowed to hold unfettered political rallies and campaigns. The now defunct Coalition for Unity and Democracy party did extremely well. But the ruling party claimed victory before the count was completed.

When opposition supporters demanded respect for their votes and held protest rallies to vent their anger, Mr. Zenawi ordered loyalist security forces to crack down on dissent. Security forces opened fire in Addis Ababa, killing 193 civilians and wounding nearly 800 others. Opposition leaders, journalists, and civil society leaders were arrested and charged with treason and genocide. Over 40,000 opposition party supporters were rounded up and detained in military camps.

This year, it was clear Mr. Zenawi had learned from his 2005 mistakes, and took a series of preemptive measures to skew the election result. He closed down a number of critical newspapers, jammed Voice of America, blocked critical websites, banned all forms opposition rallies, crippled civil society organizations, and deliberately fomented divisions in the opposition camp. The charismatic Birtukan Mideksa, whom many refer to as the Ethiopia’s Aung San Suu Kyi, and other dissidents perceived as enemies of the state, were locked up.

In 2002, British journalist Jonathan Dimbleby—who famously exposed the 1973 Ethiopian famine—travelled there to see for himself the progress the country had been making. His ensuing article, “Ethiopia Proves There Can Be Life after Death,” appeared on July 28, 2002 in the Observer, and quotes Mr. Zenawi as saying: “Africa’s downfall has always been the cult of the personality. And their names always seem to begin with M. We’ve had Mobutu and Mengistu and I’m not going to add Meles to the list.”

Today, Mr. Zenawi has comfortably joined the list he derided and despised. By the end of his new term, he will have ruled the poor nation that survives on food aid for a quarter of a century. For now, he has bought relative silence from the West by continuing to serve as a key ally in the war on terror. But in Ethiopia, totalitarian rule remains a serious act of terrorism that goes unchallenged. Ethiopia’s elections have turned out to be more embarrassing for its Western sponsors than their daredevil African ally, which shows no remorse over the death of democracy.

Mr. Gellaw is a visiting scholar at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, and its Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law. Earlier this year, he was named a Young Global Leader by the World Economic Forum.

Source: The wall street Journal

June 1, 2010 at 3:18 AM Leave a comment

Humanity’s groundbreaking ancestor didn’t live in the forest after all

 

Humanity's groundbreaking ancestor didn't live in the forest after allArdipithecus ramidus, a four million year old ancestor of humans, was so important that it was declared the biggest scientific breakthrough of 2009. That might still be true – but we might also be totally wrong about where it lived.

A central argument that spun out of the discovery in Ethiopia of Ardipithecus ramidus was that it lived in a dense, wooded canopy with a cooler, less humid climate than what now exists there now. This meant that the fossil potentially overturned the longstanding savanna hypothesis, which holds human ancestors were forced by encroaching grasslands to leave the trees and forage for food on the ground.

Now, a paper cowritten by four anthropologists and four geologists have challenged this assertion, noting that analysis of ancient soil and animal fossils found in the same region actually shows Ardipithecus lived in an area that was only 5 to 25 percent wooded, which is far, far below the minimum 60% forestation for something to be considered woodland. The researchers admit there’s a slight possibility that this particular specimen lived in a tiny wooded strip along a river, but that river was still very much situated in a savanna, not a forest.

The two main writers of the paper are Thure Cerling and Frank Brown, both of the University of Utah. They summarize what their findings mean for the forest argument put forth by Ardipithecus discoverer Tim White and his team:

Brown: ”The idea that savannas were important in human ancestors starting to walk on two legs means they spent less energy getting from one food source to another than they would have if they were still moving around on all fours. One of the big, newsworthy items that White and coworkers put forward is that Ardipithecus walked upright on two legs, yet lived in a forested environment. They then say the savanna hypothesis – which holds that the reduction in forest cover in Africa is one of the reasons for early man becoming bipedal – must be incorrect.”

Cerling: “Our conclusion is that much of the evidence that they present should be interpreted as a savanna environment, therefore their rejection of the savanna hypothesis is incorrect.”

Brown and Cerling stress they’re not actually advocating for the savanna hypothesis. Rather, they’re simply pointing out that if other researchers do want to challenge that idea and argue Ardipithecus lived in the woods, the data that exists currently is not a good place to start.

[University of Utah]

May 28, 2010 at 3:24 AM Leave a comment

What Makes a True Leader?

True Leader

Have you ever really taken the time to notice popular people! You know the ones, they have so much charisma and they seem so comfortable in their own skin. These are the kind of people that know exactly who they are. They don’t need anyone to validate them.

So how do people really show true leadership! Here is a little secret. Make others feel comfortable and tell them that everything is going to be alright. Most people are really just scared. Scared of what the future will bring and scared of just not knowing. If you reassure people, it brings calmness about them and you will be someone they feel comfortable with and safe around.

When speaking to others, look them in the face. Don’t show disinterest in what they are saying but really just listen to them. True leaders don’t interrupt conversations and they wait until others are finished speaking before they speak themselves.

Here are five traits of true leadership:

1) Don’t ever gossip:
Have you ever heard a leader put down another person! Like the president of a company gossiping about another person. You know why they don’t? It’s not important and they are more secure with who they are then to worry about what others are doing or saying.

2) Stop Complaining:
The only people that complain are the ones that are insecure with their own lives. They need validation that everything will be fine or that they will get the job they want. True leaders don’t need validation.

3) Speak Increase into Others:
People who are leaders have their entire focus on you. They aren’t waiting for you to tell them how great they are. Their entire focus is on how you are, what they can do for you and how they can help.

4) Be a good Listener:
Great leaders are great listeners. People want to be heard so be a good listener.

5) Make People Feel Safe:
They do not lean on others. Anxiety, worry and struggle are not in their vocabulary.

Those are the traits of a true leader. When you really think about it, it doesn’t take much to acquire the same character traits. By learning from others, you can then go and apply what you have learned which will bring about more confidence within yourself. Everything takes time so you just need to take that first step. Follow a true leader around for awhile and you will soon be walking in his/her footsteps.

Adrienne Smith is an internet marketing consultant and work at home business owner. She enjoys helping others succeed in all areas of their life. To read more about her, please visit her website at adriennesmith.net

May 25, 2010 at 1:58 AM Leave a comment

Critics stifled in Ethiopia

By SARAH CHILDRESS

NAIROBI, Kenya—Elections in Ethiopia on Sunday are expected to return to power a 19-year-old regime that offers the U.S. a bulwark of stability in a strife-torn region, but has drawn fire for alleged abuses to silence its domestic opponents.

Supporters of Ethiopia’s opposition coalition have been beaten and jailed, and one of the country’s last independent newspaper closed in December after its senior staff fled the country for fear of arrest.

Yet in recent years, Ethiopia has remained stable while its neighbor to the west, Sudan, has been mired in civil conflict, and to the east, Somalia has become a haven for al Qaeda-linked insurgents and high-seas pirates.

Agence France-Press/Getty ImagesSupporters of Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi rally on Thursday ahead of Sunday’s elections.

ETHIOPIA

ETHIOPIA

Ethiopia invaded Somalia in 2006, occupying it for two years, after the Islamic regime declared holy war on its neighbor. As a new U.S.-backed Somali government took over, Ethiopia has tried to smooth the transition, facilitating political talks and training troops—steps in line with U.S. security interests in the region.

Ethiopian elections Sunday are likely to favor Prime Minister Meles Zenawi, who has held the post for nearly 15 years. Voters will cast ballots for 547 members of parliament, who will elect the prime minister. Results are expected early in the week.

Mr. Zenawi’s ruling party, the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front, or EPRDF, is the largest party. Its main challenger is Medrek, a coalition of eight opposition parties that have campaigned as the party for change. The coalition has gained popularity as an alternative to the EPRDF, though much of its energy has been focused on coalition-building.

“We want to liberalize the country,” said Negasso Gidada, a Medrek party leader. The ruling party “dominates everything. We want to change that.”

Mr. Zenawi’s government can claim some major successes. Ethiopia’s economy grew 9.9% last year, according to the International Monetary Fund, and is expected to grow nearly 7% this year. But the country remains poor: One in four of Ethiopia’s 80 million people lives on less than $1 per day, according to USAID, the aid arm of the U.S. government.

The U.S. gave more than $575 million to Ethiopia last year in extensive food, health and military support—about 70% of the total aid the country received.

Yet access to food aid, college admissions and job opportunities is restricted to those who support the ruling party, say opposition leaders and Human Rights Watch.

An Ethiopian journalist, who declined to give his name for fear of retribution, said many Ethiopians expected the U.S. to do more than send food. “People are starving for freedom,” he said, “not just for food.”

Washington has chosen quiet diplomacy, a senior U.S. official said, raising these issues in discussions with Ethiopian officials behind closed doors. “Our goal is to be effective, and I’m not sure that anything other than pursuing this dialogue … would be,” said a senior U.S. official. “It is a process.”

The nonadversarial approach to Ethiopia echoes Washington’s strategy with other regimes in regions where security is a priority, but contrasts with Kenya, where Ambassador Michael Ranneberger has publicly excoriated the transitional government for not implementing reforms.

Yelibu Lijalem Belew, a spokesman at the Ethiopian Embassy in Nairobi, said Ethiopia and the U.S. maintain a “very cordial” relationship, rooted in part in their commitment to fighting terrorism.

In the 2005 parliamentary election, nearly 200 people were killed by security forces and tens of thousands arrested during protests over claims of electoral fraud that favored Mr. Zenawi’s party.

This time, opposition leaders say their supporters have been beaten and harassed. In March, an opposition parliamentary candidate was stabbed to death. The government said his killing was part of a personal dispute.

On Sunday, a candidate was arrested while campaigning and sentenced to six months in prison on a contempt charge. The government said the arrest was a mistake and pledged to release her. Human Rights Watch said that four opposition parties have reported that over 450 members or supporters had been jailed for political reasons as of November.

The State Department’s 2009 human-rights report on Ethiopia said reported abuses included “unlawful killings, torture, beating, abuse and mistreatment of detainees and opposition supporters by security forces, often acting with evident impunity.”

But the U.S. official said Ethiopia rejects the U.S. views of the political situation. “Documented incidents of human-rights abuses—we see those as facts on the ground,” said the U.S. official. “The government of Ethiopia would disagree.”

Mr. Belew said allegations of human-rights abuses documented by Human Rights Watch and the U.S. State Department weren’t accurate. “There are no deliberate human-rights abuses in our country,” he said, adding that he believed the allegations were planted by opposition parties to undermine the government.

Criticism isn’t likely to alter Ethiopia’s relationship with the U.S., he added. “They can say whatever they feel—that’s the normal thing,” said Mr. Belew, referring to government critics. “Our relationship is beyond that.”

Source: Wall Street Journal

May 22, 2010 at 6:48 PM Leave a comment

What is new in Ethiopia 2010?

By Getachew Teklu

Addis Ababa

Ethiopia has secured billions of dollars in loans from China to support the African nation’s planned development projects. The projects include the construction of a light rail line in Addis Abeba and 200 buildings by the Ethiopian Housing Corp., installation of a new Ethio-Djibouti railway line, and purchase of nine vessels for Ethiopian Shipping Lines.

The European Union, for its part, contributed an additional 4.85 million euros (USD6.1 million) to help the Ethiopian Mine Action Officeto demine lands in Tigray, Afar and Somali regions. The bloc previously contributed 9.75 million euros for the project.

Meanwhile, the Ethiopian Environmental Protection Authority has secured 200 million birr (USD14 million) from foreign funds and grants for the implementation of its proclamations, regulations and directives, which are necessary to enable Ethiopia to implement international conventions that it has ratified.

May 14, 2010 at 3:00 AM Leave a comment

Books to read-Once upon a life: Abraham Verghese

Books To Read

He was a young medical student in Ethiopia when Haile Selassie was toppled, in a coup that plunged the country into two decades of bloodshed. Here, Abraham Verghese describes the lead-up to the day in 1973 when his world turned upside-down.

Whenever I hear the phrase “geography is destiny” I think of my parents, George and Mariam, schoolteachers from India, arriving in the misty mountain empire of Ethiopia in 1951 within two weeks of each other and not knowing a soul. They were there because another traveller, Emperor Haile Selassie of Ethiopia, happened to be on a state visit to India shortly after his country was freed from Mussolini’s occupation. Haile Selassie, head of an ancient Christian nation surrounded on all sides by Muslim nations, knew of the legend of Saint Thomas’s arrival in south India, on Kerala’s shores (which took place 1,600 years before the Portuguese brought Catholicism to Goa). Saint Thomas made converts of the Brahmins he encountered. Their descendants, the Syrian Christians (so called because they owed their allegiance to the Church in Antioch) are the community to which my parents belong. The Emperor wanted to see those first churches, and his motorcade happened to drive through Kerala at the hour when the roads were thronged with legions of schoolkids in uniform.

 It was that sight, so my parents say, that so impressed Haile Selassie that he hired all 400 of his first batch of teachers for the new schools he was building across the empire from this one state in India. To this day, almost every Ethiopian you meet abroad who is over 40 years of age will tell you that they had an Indian teacher in their school, someone with an Old Testament name such as Thomas, or Jacob, or Zachariah, or Verghese (the latter derived from Giorgis, or George). A change in their geography allowed Mariam Abraham and George Verghese to meet a few weeks after they arrived in Ethiopia and they eventually married. But it all began with what the emperor saw on a morning drive. The world turns on the smallest of things.

Unlike my parents, I was born and raised in Addis Ababa. I was accepted into the medical school at what was then called Haile Selassie the First University. Our professors were Ethiopians who had trained in Beirut and British physicians who served in Ethiopia courtesy of the British Council. It was a wonderful education and I considered myself very fortunate.

In 1973, which was my third year of medical school, an ITV documentary revealed to the world a massive famine devastating the Wollo region of Ethiopia. The world knew, but we in the capital city did not. When word finally filtered back, and later when we got to secretly see the documentary (now crudely doctored so that scenes of the lavish state dinners the emperor hosted were spliced in with scenes of the famine), it spelt the end for life as we knew it.

I’d grown up with Emperor Haile Selassie’s face staring down at me from portraits in shops and houses: the famous hook nose over set and narrow lips, the regal brow and the penetrating gaze were burned into our subconscious. The Lion of Judah, the benevolent, dignified, firm, scheming monarch whose lineage could be traced back to the Queen of Sheba, seemed immortal. He had singlehandedly brought his country into the modern era. Just before the Second World War, in Haile Selassie’s speech to the League of Nations protesting about Mussolini’s invasion of Ethiopia, he had warned the world about what was coming: if you let Italy do this, then you give Hitler permission to do the same. “God and history will remember your judgment.” It made him the darling of the free world; he was Time magazine’s Man of the Year in 1936. As a ruler he was a world apart from the crude, buffoonish and cartoonish African leaders who later made headlines – the likes of Idi Amin, Mobutu or Gaddafi.

By 1973, at 81 years of age, Haile Selassie was slowing down. But he still micromanaged, insisted on approving all appointments and promotions, kept his ministers on edge, played them against each other. Perhaps this was why the famine blindsided him: no minister wished to admit the truth to him about crop failures and human suffering.

With that famine, Emperor Haile Selassie’s aura vanished. On the radio he sounded weak and ineffectual, and on TV what had previously passed for stateliness now looked like senility. He shuffled the cabinet around but it didn’t stop the students, teachers, labour unions and armed forces from agitating, demanding concessions. It was as if they were all waking from a long sleep. When the emperor raised military pay for junior officers, he only emboldened them. Soon a military “committee” called the Derg effectively ruled the country, having isolated the emperor in his palace. The Derg was about 120 men strong – hardly an efficient machine when it came to governing.

We went about our studies as best we could, but it was difficult not to be distracted by the “creeping coup”.

Early one morning the Derg sent soldiers to the Jubilee Palace (a pukka copy of Buckingham Palace) and Haile Selassie was whisked away to jail in a Volkswagen Beetle. I pictured the emperor forced to climb into the back seat of a Beetle while in the palace garage sat his fleet of Rolls-Royce, Lincoln, Mercedes and Cadillac beauties, each custom-fitted for a diminutive monarch to sit high and to be seen.

So often during my childhood, and later, we’d see a police car come speeding down the road, waving traffic to one side. My father would pull the car over and we’d step out. First came the rumble of the escort motorcycles ridden by fearsome uniformed men wearing mirrored aviator sunglasses. Then, at last, pennant flying, the limousine de jour would slide into view, a vehicle so sensuous, so shiny and long that it seemed like a vision. Everyone bowed. Older pedestrians would actually kiss the ground. I bowed to the beauty of the car. I recall the time the emperor spotted my mother in her sari and brought his palms together in a Namaste, a gesture just for her. She still talks about that.

With Haile Selassie jailed, rumours swirled and with each day the Derg issued new proclamations. The date I won’t forget is 23 November 1973. That was when the Derg’s nominal leader, General Aman Amdom, parted ways with the group. Amdom was charismatic, Sandhurst-trained, the hero of an earlier campaign to repel a Somali invasion. At a tumultuous Derg meeting, Amdom, who was Eritrean by birth, voiced the opinion that Ethiopia should allow Eritrea to secede rather than keep fighting a costly war against a formidable guerrilla force, a war that had gone on for over two decades. He also refused to sign the order to execute various ministers and members of the royal family who had been jailed — he thought it was a terrible idea, guaranteed to distance Ethiopia from the international community. He left the meeting and barricaded himself in his house, which happened to be visible from my hospital. The Derg sent troops to arrest him and a fierce battle ensued. It ended only when a tank fired a shell into the house, killing all within. We heard all the commotion, saw the smoke. Could things get any worse, I wondered?

They could. That evening – “Bloody Saturday” as it is now called – 59 distinguished Ethiopians, members of the old guard, were taken from prison, lined up and shot. They included former prime ministers, ambassadors, generals, educators and royalty – household names, people always in the news, people my parents had known personally. My parents had left the country a year earlier, seeing the writing on the wall. At the time I’d felt resentful of their abandoning the place, but on “Bloody Saturday” I was grateful they were not around to witness the end. The barbarians had clearly taken the reins. A man named Mengistu emerged as a leader of the Derg.

Ethiopians are generous people: hospitable, formal and polite to a fault. As a schoolboy I remember sensing that these attributes were balanced by an undercurrent of violence that could be striking when it was revealed; for all I knew, this was true of all countries. It had not been that many years since the lebeshay method of divining guilt in Ethiopia was outlawed: this practice consisted of drugging a little boy and taking him to the scene of the crime, and in his hallucinatory state he was asked to point out the guilty party. Who knows how many innocents were killed by a child’s pointing finger? A previous coup attempt during my childhood had led to the hangings of the mutineers – I can recall viewing the bodies swaying from a scaffold in the centre of town.

But to me our violent bent in Ethiopia was most evident in street fights. What was peculiar was the choice of weapons – I have yet to see it anywhere else. If the opponents found themselves 20 paces away they would scramble to fling stones; bystanders beware. At fisticuffs range, the goal changed to delivering a testa – a head butt. Testa – head, in Italian – was a weapon so unique to Ethiopia that there were some who claimed it to be an ancient Ethiopian martial art. If so there were no dojos, no sensei, and no black belts, just lots of busted orbits and fractured noses.

As medical students in the casualty ward, scalp wounds were the most common injury we would see. To have the head be both the weapon of choice and the target of choice doubled the chances of a scalp wound. The wardboys in the casualty office did the stitching. The doctor’s job was to check the pupils, check the mentation and decide if further observation was needed. Bleeding from such wounds could be dramatic, startling to the novice. A professor taught us to not be so impressed with the bleeding: “Head injuries are only important because the head contains the brain,” he said, which at the time seemed both funny and self-evident. But it was profound: scalp and skull injuries, no matter how bloody, only mattered because of the possibility of brain injury.

In the aftermath of Aman Amdom’s murder and then of the Bloody Saturday massacre, it was bullet wounds one had to worry about. Since the revolution was led by junior officers, the lowliest enlisted man felt empowered. Bars were filled with military men in mufti, only their highly polished shoes giving them away. If a fight broke out, a gun or even a grenade could be pulled out.

All through this time I lived with three foreign students (from Cameroon, Kenya and Nigeria). We rented a small house on an unpaved street not far from the main road. The Derg had just closed the university for a year, and the plan was to send all students to the countryside to educate the masses. We thought it was just a ploy to get the intellectuals out of town. Expatriates like us had no choice but to leave the country. Time hung heavily on our hands as we tried to get the requisite papers. There was a curfew at eight in the evening and even in the daytime it wasn’t always safe to go out. We often heard gunshots at night. This was the period when several of my Ethiopian classmates went underground to fight for the Eritrean secessionist guerrillas or other liberation groups.

One morning as I ventured out for some groceries, I encountered a sight that changed everything: a body left on the street near the main road, a dark stain of blood on the ground from a bullet wound to the head. This sort of thing had happened before, but that day it gave me pause. There was something so dislocating about seeing a corpse outside the hospital. No one was inclined to pick up the body and no one lingered. He appeared to have been executed. His face was familiar, not an acquaintance but perhaps someone living in the neighbourhood. Or perhaps the dead all look alike.

All day that image lingered with me – not so much his face but the memory of that big blood stain on the ground, like a pillow for his head. The words kept coming to me, “Head injuries are only important because the head contains the brain.” This clearly was the important kind of head injury.

I saw much violence before that and after, but that sight, that blood stain felt like a personal message to me, an instruction that it was time to get out.

One day, at last, I had the requisite papers and permissions and I was aboard a plane bound for Rome. I wish I could say I shed tears as I sat looking out at the runway. No, I could not wait to leave. If “geography is destiny” I could not wait to change my geography.

As I looked out of the porthole, I had no way of knowing that in the ensuing years Mengistu would kill untold numbers of people in purges that made him worthy of Stalin, or that Ethiopia would adopt an Albanian-style communism, and become a vassal of the Soviet Union. I didn’t know that Mengistu would rule for nearly two decades, and that it would not be until 1991 that a liberation army led by a medical student one year my junior, Meles Zenawi, would drive Mengistu into exile (and Meles would become prime minister of Ethiopia). I had no such foresight. All I kept seeing as the plane lumbered down the runway was a lifeless body, a deep square blood stain framing the head, and how I wanted to put as much distance as I could between me and that sight.

Source: The Guardian

April 11, 2010 at 5:51 AM Leave a comment

Nine Things You Should Know about Penalties

April-15

The tax filing deadline is approaching. If you don’t file your return and pay your tax by the due date you may have to pay a penalty. Here are nine things the IRS wants you to know about the two different penalties you may face if you do not pay or file on time.
1. If you do not file by the deadline, you might face a failure-to-file penalty.
2. If you do not pay by the due date, you could face a failure-to-pay penalty.
3. The failure-to-file penalty is generally more than the failure-to-pay penalty. So if you cannot pay all the taxes you owe, you should still file your tax return and explore other payment options in the meantime.
4. The penalty for filing late is usually 5 percent of the unpaid taxes for each month or part of a month that a return is late. This penalty will not exceed 25 percent of your unpaid taxes.
5. If you file your return more than 60 days after the due date or extended due date, the minimum penalty is the smaller of $135 or 100 percent of the unpaid tax.
6. You will have to pay a failure-to-pay penalty of ½ of 1 percent of your unpaid taxes for each month or part of a month after the due date that the taxes are not paid. This penalty can be as much as 25 percent of your unpaid taxes.
7. If you filed an extension and you paid at least 90 percent of your actual tax liability by the due date, you will not be faced with a failure-to-pay penalty if the remaining balance is paid by the extended due date.
8. If both the failure-to-file penalty and the failure-to-pay penalty apply in any month, the 5 percent failure-to-file penalty is reduced by the failure-to-pay penalty. However, if you file your return more than 60 days after the due date or extended due date, the minimum penalty is the smaller of $135 or 100% of the unpaid tax.
9. You will not have to pay a failure-to-file or failure-to-pay penalty if you can show that you failed to file or pay on time because of reasonable cause and not because of willful neglect.

Source IRS

March 18, 2010 at 4:08 AM Leave a comment

Older Posts Newer Posts


Calendar

May 2012
S S M T W T F
« Apr    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Posts by Month

Posts by Category


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.